It seems that throughout history, modern and ancient, the greatest efforts expended by man have been directed towards the development of war weapons. It may be a response to man’s aggressiveness that wants domination of others as means of survival. If a man can command others he has a substantial buffer against outside pressures since he can marshal others to face the dangers before he himself has to.
Humanists will say, on the other hand, that it is in reaction to the aggression of people with greater means, the lesser ones trying to blunt, if not neutralize, the superiority of the enemy in say, number of weapons, via a superior weapon. This is the essence of Hitler’s vergeltungswaffen, the V1 and V2 rockets, and the Messerchmitt262, the first jetfighter ever to fly. Adolf Hitler sought to counter the Allied Powers’ superiority in weapons quantity and men through ‘miracle weapons’ or, more exactly, ‘vengeance weapons’.
But the landmark world war weapons are not the rockets, but the tanks. In both world wars, tanks, either by greater number or better tactics, forced the outcome of decisive battles in all areas of conflict. With tanks, much territory was captured or great damage inflicted on the enemy that for him retreat was the only option. When the tank was first introduced, for example, in the Battle of the Somme during World War 1, the Germans were caught greatly unaware by the formidable weapon they were forced to give ground. Technology won the day for the Allies at the time.
Thus Germany used the tank as main offensive weapon –along with air attacks— in their blitzkrieg strategies in World War 2. Tank formations enabled Heinz Guderian’s forces to penetrate very deeply into French territory in the first days of the conflict that they would have reached the English Channel had Hitler not stopped him. The German Army Command and Hitler believed Guderian was lying in his combat progress reports and commanded him to stop for verification. Thus, the miracle of Dunkirk came to pass.
But among the civil war weapons, perhaps the bayonet was the most important. Hand-to-hand- fighting was performed there in significant scale and the bayonet was a decisive weapon for either side. The bayonet eclipsed the sword which was a primarily cavalry weapon, and the repeating rifle which have not come yet in great numbers to play a pivotal role in the conflict. After the musket, the bayonet was the second most effective killing instrument at the time.
Among the medieval weapons, perhaps the most significant weapon –if it may be called so since it is for a defensive purpose— is the knight’s armor. A knight in his armor can kill many largely unprotected yeomanry and duel with a similar knight within a day without himself getting physically damaged —only tired probably—, and still retire for the night to fight again the next day. He is much protected in his suit of armor that he can confident of surviving every battle, until the English long bow gave him his match.
But the long bow is a totally different topic for discussion next.
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.